- The Bonk
- Posts
- 🏊‍♂️ From Dead Last to Course Record: The Truth About Swimming in Ironman
🏊‍♂️ From Dead Last to Course Record: The Truth About Swimming in Ironman
Because in triathlon, it’s not who leads the swim—it’s who masters the long game.
You don’t win an Ironman in the swim—but you swim just well enough to get to the bike.
It’s a hard-earned truth in triathlon, proven time and again by pros like Lionel Sanders. At the 2016 Ironman Arizona, Sanders emerged 52nd from Tempe Town Lake, turning a rough start into a blistering course record of 7:44:29. The takeaway? Swimming sets the stage, but the real drama unfolds on land.
Swimming might be the first leg, but it’s the shortest—just 12% of a full Ironman. The other 88%? That’s where the race is won or lost. While the numbers sound simple, the biomechanics are anything but.
Gif by rowindreef on Giphy
Here’s why: powerful cyclists and runners come equipped with traits that work against them in water.
Hill-crushing, muscular legs? They sink. Drag in water is up to 800 times stronger than in air at 20 mph, making streamlined form essential. Low body fat, great for power-to-weight ratio on land, turns into a buoyancy struggle.
Upper bodies built for bike aero positions lack the muscle patterns that make swimmers glide.
And Sanders? Known for his less-than-stellar swim splits but feared for his bike-run prowess, he’s living proof of a fundamental truth: swimming success has diminishing returns in long-course racing.
So, what’s the lesson? Strategic triathletes don’t skip swim practice; they master it just enough to stay in the race. The real investment is in the bike and run, where the biggest gains are made.
Next time you see a pro lagging behind after the swim, take note. They’re not beaten; they’re just getting started.